Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts (on different days) by addressing one of the following questions:
- What is another disorder you would like to learn more about and why is it important to you?
- What additional insights do you have about the question or concern they discussed related to the “Cautionary Statement for Forensic Use of DSM-5”?
- What insights or questions do you have related to their discussion of the ethical and/or legal issues associated with the disorder they selected?
Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (200–300 words) and supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources and properly cited in APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable within meaningful responses but cannot stand alone as a response. Responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning for all students.